Search for: "CARR v. MERCK "
Results 1 - 20
of 24
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2019, 7:25 am
The AmeriKat hiding from work-relatedintruders in the Castello's gardenRight at the end of July, came big news from the Irish Supreme Court in Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp v Clonmel Healthcare Ltd 2019 IESC 65. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 7:30 pm
Such was the story in Actavis v Lilly. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 2:11 pm
In determining that the court has jurisdiction to grant the declaration sought, Mr Justice Carr conducted a thorough analysis of the leading case on declaratory relief in patent cases - Arrow Generics Ltd v Merck & Co Inc [2007] EWHC 1900 - and provided helpful signposts as to when such relief would be appropriate. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 8:18 am
Granting a negative declaration - see Arrow v Merck [2007] EWHC 1900 (Pat) (in the context of an application for strike out). [read post]
10 May 2019, 6:05 am
The observation that it would be inappropriate to grant someone a monopoly over such a varied collection of goods was made in the case Court of Appeal case Merck v Merck. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 11:48 am
.* Storm in a C Cup: Mr Justice Carr refuses injunction and account of profits in Stretchline v H&M spatElettra Bietti (A&O) summarises for the Kat-readership the recent and unreported decision of Mr Justice Carr in the on-going Stretchline v H&M dispute [see previous posts here], which serves as a warning for all those who draft IP settlement agreements in the event of future infringements.* Pharmaceuticals, Fig Leaves and Accidental… [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 9:24 am
A declaration in these terms is described as an Arrow declaration, due to the form of relief sought in Arrow Generics Limited v Merck & Co. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 6:01 am
Bashe Abdi Yousuf (08-1555) - Petitioner's brief Thursday, Dec. 3: Carr v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 1:53 am
* English Patent Court speeds up, reminds Mr Justice Carr in Celltrion v BiogenCelltrion Inc. v Biogen Idec Inc., F. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 2:59 am
* Fujifilm Kyowa Biologics can use declaratory relief to clear the way for its Humira biosimilar in the UK, rules Mr Justice Carr Annsley pens of Mr Justice Carr’s decision in Fujifilm Kyowa Biologics v AbbVie Biotechnology [2016] EWHC 374. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 1:00 pm
Eleonora Rosati discusses the VAT Directive comprising the equal treatment for both printed and electronic publications and its implications on digital exhaustion matters.Negative decision for anti-HIV therapy patent: Merck Sharpe & Dohme v Shionogi Co LimitedGuest Kat Eibhlin Vardy recaps Merck Sharp and Dohme Limited v Shionongi & Co Limited, [2016] EWHC 2989 (Pat), involving the alleged infringement of Shionogi’s European Patent, entitled… [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 10:48 pm
”However, in Hospira v Cubist [2016] EWHC 1285 (Pat), Carr J suggested that he would have found Claim 1, which included the use of a standard buffer, a standard agent and a standard purification process, obvious over the CGK alone had he not already found it obvious over a piece of prior art. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 8:53 pm
EBI Medical (cold pack) Deposition2000-11-30 Carr v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 7:25 am
The judge also cautioned that the purpose of the declarations in the present proceedings is different to the motivations for the declarations sought in Arrow Generics Limited v Merck & Co. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 2:58 pm
| Negative decision for anti-HIV therapy patent: Merck Sharpe & Dohme v Shionogi Co Limited | Book review: Copyright and E-Learning | Friday Fantasies | Fontem see their patent “vaporised” – the dangers of added matter | BREAKING: Antidote found for poisonous priorities | Around the IP blogs | AIPPI Congress Report 5: Antitrust and Pharma - seeking a balance | When the Rolling Stones visited 2120 South Michigan Avenue in Chicago | No measure of success in… [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 4:44 am
Justice Birss’s rulings in Varian Medical Systems AG v (1) Elekta Limited; and (2) Elekta Holdings Limited [2016] EWHC 2679 (Pat) cases. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 8:35 am
I BREAKING: Unanimous Supreme Court in Samsung v Apple finds that damages may be based on a component, not whole product I Will Iceland's EU trade mark end up on ice? [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 6:00 am
Dec. 30, 2009) (applying Ohio law); Carr-Davis v. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 2:01 am
| Negative decision for anti-HIV therapy patent: Merck Sharpe & Dohme v Shionogi Co Limited | Book review: Copyright and E-Learning | Friday Fantasies | Fontem see their patent “vaporised” – the dangers of added matter | BREAKING: Antidote found for poisonous priorities | Around the IP blogs | AIPPI Congress Report 5: Antitrust and Pharma - seeking a balance | When the Rolling Stones visited 2120 South Michigan Avenue in Chicago | No measure of success in… [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
EBI Medical (cold pack) Deposition2000-11-30 Carr v. [read post]
